September 11, 2023 9 Comments
Some of us are excited about Matter, some of us are dismissive, some of us are anxious. What does it mean for my Z-Wave gear? Will my smart home system become obsolete or incompatible with devices from my favorite brands? There’s a lot of uncertainty behind Matter’s promises and not many details about how Z-Wave will play into the new landscape. In this blog post, we take a closer look at how Z-Wave and Matter can coexist and interact in the future.
To start, Matter is an emerging solution while Z-Wave is a mature smart home protocol with 20 years in the field and over four thousand certified devices. While Matter is backed by all of the big tech names, Z-Wave owns 95% of the smart home security market today. It will take a while before Matter products are widely available and even longer before their functionality and settings match Z-Wave devices.
The biggest difference though, is that Matter is just an application layer. It provides a solution for the user to interact with their network, enabling authentication between devices, providing an interface for the communication, etc but it doesn’t manage the network. Matter devices will still depend on common wireless protocols to interact with one another. These include Wi-Fi, Ethernet, or Bluetooth with all of their network range and speed issues.
Z-Wave on the other hand, is a full stack solution that encompasses the application layer, networking layer, and the physical layer of a sub-GHz network. It creates a connected environment dedicated to your smart home with signal encryption and mesh technology for a safe and robust communication. Z-Wave Long Range has added direct hub-to-device messages to the network infrastructure, allowing for even more coverage (over a mile and between buildings) and ultra-fast response time.
It's hard to imagine that security providers or serious smart home owners would give up the benefits of low-power sub-gig networks like Z-Wave in favor of the much busier and range-limited Wi-Fi or Bluetooth environments. But what if you didn’t have to choose?
Whether you’re a pro planning a sophisticated IoT project or a home automation DIY enthusiast, you’ll want to simplify the way you interact with your connected devices. You’ll want easy access from your smart phone, voice control from Alexa, Google, or Siri, and maybe even some interaction through a custom interface you built yourself. You’ll want some of your smart home devices to speak to your Wi-Fi hardware and probably at least some form of cloud access to keep an eye on things when you’re not around. Ideally, you’ll be able to mix and match devices running on different protocols in your connected ecosystem.
That’s why bridging is key and Matter is not going to change that. In fact, technology to bridge Matter to other protocols, including Z-Wave is already out there. Silicon Labs, the company that effectively owns many of these protocols, has released a dedicated software development kit to help companies link to the Matter ecosystem. The Unify SDK is a great start to a more transparent and user friendly IoT landscape.
The next step is to equip device chips with multi-protocol capabilities. So far, most IoT products have needed a dedicated chip to support each wireless standard. That’s about to change with innovative offerings from Silicon Labs (their Z-Wave 800 Modem SoC can also support Sidewalk, CONNECT, and mioty) and the new second source chip supplier for Z-Wave, Trident IoT. We’re excited for these hardware changes and their positive impact on device manufacturing.
Finally, we’ve learned that the potential of collaboration and interoperability can only be truly realized in open-source environments. Home Assistant is the most notable example of a powerful platform seamlessly connecting hundreds of brands and protocols in a single dashboard. It exploded among DIY and professional users in the past few years. While Matter was created as an open-source project, Z-Wave has historically been a proprietary technology. It’s now opened up the source code to Z-Wave Alliance members which suggests it may go full open source at some point.
Matter doesn’t make the compatibility problem go away. You’ll still need to check for the Matter logo before buying a new product for your smart home and the transition period will be bumpy. And this will only bring Matter devices to where Z-Wave has always been in terms of interoperability – look for the Z-Wave logo on the product and you know it will work with other Z-Wave devices. The most dramatic aspect of Matter’s arrival is scale. This new application layer will (hopefully) make millions of devices from the biggest tech companies play together well. But that doesn’t mean all other IoT technologies will become obsolete.
Have you noticed that the title of this post doesn’t say “Z-Wave VS Matter”? It doesn’t say “Z-Wave OR Matter?” either. This is because we believe that the smart home space will depend on multiple protocols and application layers to deliver truly customized and scalable products or services. The era of one-fits-all solutions is over. Interconnectivity and cross development are bread and butter in the Information Age.
As the open-source model continues to spread among creators and users alike, we’ll see increased efforts to share code and encourage collaborations between brands, teams, and methodologies. And we’re here for it, with the interoperability of Z-Wave as a stable foundation for the new smart home era.
Share your thoughts and questions in the comments section below, we'd love to hear what you think!
January 02, 2024
Did you forget to mention Thread?
January 02, 2024
What I have truly liked about my Z-Wave Smart Home is that it works when my internet is down (except for my cloud based thermostat and garage door opener), it doesn’t clutter up my wifi network, and it is secure. My brother-in-law has his elderly parents living with him. His parents have every device they have on the house wifi and use Alexa to control everything. My brother-in-law complains about all the needless traffic cluttering up the wifi. With my Smart Home i have little control traffic on my wifi. I think it’s much better.
January 02, 2024
As you tried to point out comparing Matter and Z-wave I’ll like comparing a whole car with a cars interior. Related but not the whole story. Let’s see the same discussion with Thread in the picture. I still agree that Z-wave is here to stay for many years to come, but a true glance into the future requires consideration of thread.
January 02, 2024
I view Matter as a great way to get local control and “connectivity insurance” for more complex devices that would ordinarily only have cloud connectivity. My concern, particularly with less established smart device vendors is them going out of business and killing their customers’ devices when their cloud shuts down. Matter addresses both of these issues and frankly I won’t buy a device if it has cloud only. As such , at this point I don’t really care if the device supports local control via zwave, zigbee or matter over IP (or thread). I have ~60 zwave and ~40 zigbee devices, so I’m pretty invested in both ecosystems and they both work well, although zigbee has given me more problems with devices that don’t quite meet spec.
January 02, 2024
The problem with Matter as it stands isn’t the technology. Version 1.0 of everything is by definition immature. The technical problems it has yet to solve are solvable.
The problem is the organization behind Matter. Or more accurately the working groups who aren’t really working right.
Start with smart plugs: why is there no power monitoring? That was table stakes! Matter-ready devices lost power monitoring when they got Matter firmware. This keeps going. Lights are limited, thread network management features aren’t required, the firmware validation (and block chain) is missing in action, and controller device sharing is a balkanized mess of side deals.
All of these are own-goal fails at the administrative layer, not the technical. The approach seems to be “release more 80% solutions” rather than getting the core to 98%. And that creates technical debt that will cause problems in the future.
January 02, 2024
What hasn’t been mentioned is that since Matter is an application layer interface, that not only uses Thread as a transport but also uses Wi-Fi, it’s entirely possible to built a Matter gateway that serves a Z-Wave network.
January 02, 2024
Great article! You didn’t mention Thread or Zigbee, how do those compare to Zwave?
January 02, 2024
I have lived through this type of technology battle many times in my life. Most customers are going to be comfortable when they hear buzzwords they know, like wi-fi, app, router, etc. We in Z-wave speak in RF, listen-mode, nodes, associations, etc., which are foreign terms to the uneducated. Give a know-nothing the option between Homeseer and Zooz, or Nest and Ring, and they’ll take the latter every time. While I am fully invested and committed to Z-wave for all the right reasons, deep pockets and the right ad campaign could spell the end for Z-wave in the US. Additionally it wouldn’t be unusual for a big name to buy up all the Z-wave manufacturers and/or distributors, then squash them like a bug. I know it because I’ve lived it in other electronic arenas.
I don’t wish it because it will affect me in a big way, but I won’t be surprised if Z-wave is the Atari of the future. I truly hope that isn’t the case but Z-wave has always been nerdy. It really isn’t all that user-friendly and we’re all to blame for that.
October 16, 2023
Z-Wave devices are all interoperable. This means that technically, any Z-Wave enabled device can successfully communicate with another Z-Wave device, exchanging messages using wireless signal. Regardless of the brand, chip version, or product type, they work together seamlessly. Or do they?
March 22, 2023 4 Comments
Let’s take a closer look at the first Z-Wave focused hub for US and Canada. We will uncover its primary benefits, UI features, how to use the Z-Box mobile app, and what sets the system apart from other hubs available today.
As we often tell our customers, there isn’t one perfect smart home platform to solve it all. The Z-Box Hub is no exception. What makes it unique is its focus on easy access to advanced automation functionality while keeping the key data and processes off-cloud.
May 05, 2022 3 Comments
Insteon just became another smart home company to shut down their services. Overnight, the platform’s servers were disconnected, leaving their customers without a functional smart home. SmartLabs, Insteon’s mother company, claims to have sold over 5 million connected devices; that’s a lot of sensors, switches, and controllers that became orphaned. Does it mean that all of this hardware is now completely useless?
It turns out that there are ways to salvage your Insteon products and continue using them, at least to some extent, on other platforms who stepped up and provided integration for this protocol. However, these workarounds are less than user-friendly and will require more time and possible frustration around a system that’s no longer backed by any official support. What’s the alternative and is it even worth it to have a connected house these days?
Eric
January 02, 2024
Good article and it’s all true. However, this article leaves out one critical component of the new Matter standard – the Thread protocol. Thread has a lot of advantages and competes in the same low-power, low-bandwidth scenarios that Z-Wave excels at. It’s true that not all the kinks are worked out, but for low-power and low-bandwidth devices Thread solves a lot and promises much greater compatibility with current and future smart home platforms than Z-Wave does on the networking side without all the disadvantages and risks of WiFi.
Matter over WiFi is great for higher-bandwidth devices like cameras (eventually) and whatnot, and it’s nice to have the application layer abstracted from the network layer vs. a homogeneous vertical stack like in Z-Wave so that the right protocol can be used for the right use.
There is also the risk that as smartlocks, switches, plugs, and whatnot using Thread proliferate that manufacturers could reduce support for Z-Wave so that they only have to test for one single interoperability standard. That’s the ideal of course, not the reality yet, but we’ll have to see what the future holds. I believe smart door locks will be less expensive if there is just a thread version rather than having to test with bluetooth, NFC, WiFi, Zigbee, and Zwave, plus all the different application layers on top.
I have no fear of buying and using Z-Wave right now. What my worry is that the use of those Z-Wave devices will be bridged properly into a Matter-compliant smart home platform and preserve the functionality that’s present in Z-Wave today. The only alternatives would be to have a fractured platform, move to a platform that can rule them all (like Smartthings or especially HA like you mentioned) or in the worst case replace devices like people had to do with X10 and other legacy standards. I hope Silicon Labs and other companies keep working to open up Z-Wave, build upon it’s strengths, and work hard to bridge that functionality into Matter in a way that can work with any future Matter platform.